Digital Video File Formats

Posted by thegeek | Posted in Tech | Posted on 12-10-2009

Lots of people think digital video file formats are terribly complex. All that confusing alphabet soup seems like Greek. Who can understand it?

Actually, video file formats are NOT that difficult. Most formats are compatible with multiple players and will work in many situations. Lots of people think there is only ONE magic format that works best. Truth is, all formats have their pros and cons and are good for different reasons.

Converting from one format to another is no more difficult that doing a “save as” with a word document. You pick which format you want and the software does the rest. Any video editing software should be able to convert into multiple formats.

To fully understand internet video and work with confidence, it pays to know the most common formats. This article lists the most common ones and their pros, cons and typical uses.

First, a brief explanation about why so many digital video file formats exist and what that really means.

Video files are huge. To play them on the web or your computer, they have to be compressed, or made smaller. This is done by designing ways to take information out of the video signal. If you take information out, the resulting file is smaller. The smaller file will be one of many different file formats. Which format it is is indicated by the three letters (sometimes 4) that follow the file name.

Example: If a video file name is MyVacation.mov, the .mov means it is a Quicktime Movie file, which is an Apple format. If the video file is MyVacation.wmv, the .wmv means it is Windows Media Video, which is Microsoft.

Lots of different companies and organizations have designed programs to compress video. They each have their own way of doing it, so you have lots of different file formats. Some were created by Microsoft, some by Apple, some by standardizing agencies like the Motion Picture Experts Group.

Once you compress a video, you have to have a program that “reads” it, basically uncompressing it to play. The program that “reads” the video is called a video player. Video players are built to read particular file formats and not others. This is where the incompatability comes in.

Microsoft was never anxious for you to see videos made by Apple computers, so they made their video players incapable of deciphering an Apple-made video and visa versa.

So everybody is competing and the nature of the beast guarantees incompatibility.

The good news is that over the years, more and more compatibility was built into the system. So now, most computers contain multiple players, one of which will handle whatever video you want to play. Most online video sites can also handle multiple formats. So in general, if you stick with the most common formats, you will be fine.

It’s also quite common to convert from one type to another. So if you have a .wmv file that won’t play on your Mac, you can get some software to turn it into a .mov file.

Here is a list of the most common formats and gives some pros and cons for each.

Once you understand how easy video formats really are, you can convert and upload with confidence!

.avi: This is an early form of video file. .avi originated with Microsoft and it is basically uncompressed video. This means .avi files are still HUGE. the fact that it has been around forever means it is highly compatible with most players. However, most of the time, .avi is simply too big for a finished video. .avi is better used as a format in the beginning stages of video production, not for the final output.

.wmv: Another Microsoft format. .wmv stands for Windows Media Video. .wmv files are tiny because they are highly compressed. Any video this highly compressed looks a bit ragged. The more you compress a video, the more info you take out and this makes your resolution suffers. Compression is always a balance between file size and image quality. But tiny video files are a great thing. .wmv files are the type of videos you get emailed directly to you. .wmv are about the only type of file small enough to email.

.mov files: .mov stands for a Quicktime Movie file, which is Apple. .mov files look great, but they are still awfully big. If you took two copies of the exact same video and turned one into a .mov and the other into a .wmv, the .mov would look a lot better, but might be about 80MB and the .wmv only about 2 MB so no wonder .mov looks better!

.flv: .flv means it is a Flash video format. This is an extremely common and popular format because it is small but still looks great. Also, .flv is highly compatible with most computers so for these two reasons, it is probably the #1 file format found on the web. If you are watching a video online, it is probably in .flv format. That does NOT mean it was originally a .flv however. Most internet sites like You Tube will accept multiple format uploads, but before they are actually posted online, You Tube converts it to .flv for you.

MPEG2: MPEG 2 is the type of video file the a home DVD player will read. If you go out and rent a Hollywood Movie from Blockbuster, the DVD will contain an MPEG2 file. MPEG2 files are HUGE. They are not compressed at all. MPEG2 is way too big for the web. MPEG2 is also incompatible with video editing software. You can not edit an MPEG2 file without converting it first. Some new video cameras shoot on MPEG2 because camera manufacturers have realized more people care about the ability to pop their home movies into a DVD player to instantly watch than care about editing their video. So if you are buying a video camera, keep this in mind.

MPEG4: MPEG 4 is a format that produces tiny files that still look pretty good. Not as good as Quicktime, but they are so much smaller in size the trade off is worth it if you are mostly concerned with size, not high resolution. A video that is 100MB as a quicktime move might only be about 10 MB as a MPEG2.

Which file format is “best” for you to use depends on how you are going to use it. If you want to email a video, it had better be tiny so you need to throw high resolution out the window. On the other hand, if you are trying to impress some big money investors with a video of your invention,high resolution would be way more important than a tiny file size.

I hope this helps. Digital video file formats can indeed seem confusing because there are so many of them and they are all slightly different. But my educated guess would be that 90% of the videos you will encounter one of the file formats listed above.

As always, visit my blog, Video Production Tips and let me know what concerns you have about internet video production.

If you want to learn how to make video>/a> you will find all the free information you need at Lorraine Grula’s blog, www.VideoProductionTips.comArticle Source:http://www.articlesbase.com/computers-articles/digital-video-file-formats-1329872.html

Video Editing Software – What is the BEST?

Posted by thegeek | Posted in Tech | Posted on 12-10-2009

I often have people ask me, “What’s the best video editing software to use?”

My answer is always, “It depends.”

What are you going to edit? How much experience do you have? How complicated do you want to get?

What is “best” for one person won’t necessarily be best for the next person.

Personally, I use Final Cut Express. I love it. FCE will do almost everything it’s big brother, Final Cut Studio will do. The biggest difference between the two is in the number of video file formats it works with. Final Cut Studio works with a larger number of professional grade formats.

I still shoot on mini dv, which is accepted in Final Cut Express, so I saved myself a bundle and bought FCE. ($1,200 vs. $300)

Validation for my luv of FCE came when I read Videomaker Magazine’s annual Best Products of the Year awards. Videomaker gave Final Cut Express the “Best Video Editing Software” title.

According to Videomaker, FCE is a fantastic, low-cost stepping stone into professional-grade editing. The newest version, FCE 4.0 even accepts AVCHD, the new high-definition format.

VideoMaker’s annual “Best” awards have several more categories for video editing software. In a category they call, “Best Introductory Editing Software,” Videomaker declared a tie between Pinnacle Studio Ultimate 12 ($129) and Corel Video Studio Pro X2, ($99). According to Videomaker, both programs are simple enough for beginners but powerful enough to do complex tasks. (FCE would probably drive newbies just as nuts as Final Cut Pro.)

Pinnacle Studio actually has three levels of complexity and price. Pinnacle Studio is the least expensive at $49, Studio Plus comes in at $99 and Ultimate v. 12 costs $129. All three keep simplicity at the forefront by configuring tasks as templates rather than making the editor select all variables involved. This feature is definitely what a beginner wants.

Corel Video Studio comes in two levels of complexity and price. Pro X2 costs $99 and the basic version runs $70. The basic version limits you to two video tracks and two video overlay tracks while the pro version gives you seven.

When considering an entire suite of video editing software, VideoMaker Magazine gave the top nod to Adobe Creative Suite 4 Production Premium at $1,699. NOT CHEAP. But you get all this: Illustrator, Photoshop Extended, Flash Professional, After Effects, Premiere Pro (the actual video editing software), Encore, Sound Booth, Device Control, Bridge and Dynamic Link. If you are really serious about achieving professional level video editing, this would be a great package. If you don’t need quite that much capability, you can get Premiere Pro by itself for $799. Adobe has done a good job of making Premiere much more user-friendly over the years and they also now have a version for Mac.

Adobe also won a Most Innovative Software award for Visual Communicator 3, made especially for the video blogger. Adobe touts it as streaming video made simple. The software helps you with the entire production process, not just post production. It includes a teleprompter as well as features that let you upload your to the web. Adobe purchased this software from a company called Serious Magic.

The final software award, Best Visual Effects Software, was given to proDAD Adorage. If you want to add lots of fancy transitions, this software includes transition effects such as Particles and Lights, Universal Tricks, Diamond Composites, Power FX Pearls, Eyecatcher FX and Particles and Objects. All nine volumes together sell for $499. You can get individual packages starting at $73. Keep in mind this software is not full-fledged video editing software, but rather a package to use in conjunction with standard video editing software.

So if you have been looking to buy some video editing software, consider your needs and budget. Then you can decide what is best for you.

Thanks for reading Video Production Tips

Lorraine Grula
Internet Video Gal

If you want to learn how to make video you will find all the free information you need at Lorraine Grula’s blog, www.VideoProductionTips.comArticle Source:http://www.articlesbase.com/computers-articles/video-editing-software-what-is-the-best-1329890.html

iPhone Extended Battery Packs: Are Extended iPhone Batteries Worth the Cost?

Posted by thegeek | Posted in Tech | Posted on 12-10-2009

The Apple iPhone continues to get complaints from consumers on the poor battery life and the lack of the consumer’s ability to replace the battery. With all its great features the iPhone battery can get drained quickly. The only option to extended the life of an iPhone battery is to carry a charger around with you or purchase an extended battery pack.

The cheapest option is to remember to charge your iPhone nightly and carry your charger with you everyone you go – including the office, your vehicle and on airplanes. This alternative will work for many people most of the time.

Unfortunately, relying on chargers is not the optimal choice for people who watch movies on the go, use their GPS for navigation or need to talk on the phone for extended periods of time. New apps are released by the hour and make mobile users even more dependent on their iphone. An example of people who can’t be tethered to an electrical outlet is medical professionals who use the iPhone to save patient data on their rounds. Some joggers and runners need the GPS to track their routes.

If having a working iPhone is essential to you, it might be worth considering the purchase of an extended battery pack. Most cost somewhere between $40 and $100 and offer several options for your needs. Some are completely separate devices that connect to the iPhone with a cord while others actually fit like a glove.

Something else to consider is that the iPhone battery is not designed to be user-replaceable and will need to be eventually replaced. When it no longer holds a sufficient charge, the user sends in their phone and $86.50 to Apple to have it replaced in about 3 days. An external battery pack can extended the life of the battery which may delay or avoid the $86.50 charge (at least until it’s convenient for you to be without it for a few days), using the external battery to power the device.

The iPhone is an amazing device that has a major Achilles heel in its battery life. Purchasing an external battery pack will be well worth the cost to avoid being stuck without access to your phone, GPS, iPod, web, and the innumerable applications to which you have grown to love.


For More on How to Replace an iPod Battery and to Get the Best Prices on iPod and iPhone Batteries, Visit the iPod Replacement Batteries Store Today!

Article Source:http://www.articlesbase.com/computers-articles/iphone-extended-battery-packs-are-extended-iphone-batteries-worth-the-cost-1330398.html